santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. 5 To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. 50, inclusive, The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a lemon law case. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. I. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. 7 Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Probate Tentative Rulings. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 408.882.2296 (fax) Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, 18CV327382]. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 15 Footnote 15: (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. INTRODUCTION II. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Family Law Tentative Rulings. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SAETERN, ET AL. I. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. 3 23 I. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). This is a lemon law action. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al Background and Discovery Dispute V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. Footnote 16: Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. 23 I. C. Factual Local Rule 1.06 (B). David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. 24 JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. DATE: 3 June 202. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Background Contact Us. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. INTRODUCTION V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? may be downloaded from the Court's 26 This is a putative class action. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Please wait a moment while we load this page. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Factual and Procedural Background -2 RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. Background 6 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Check Jury Reporting Status. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. for each matter on the next day's calendar. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. Patricia M. Lucas. vs. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Code of Civ. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Factual Background THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 24 I. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, Association, Inc., et al. DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges Court Calendars. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: . Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. You can always see your envelopes Probate Tentative Rulings. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). () Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. smanoukian@scscourt.org 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. HARPER, ET AL. Case no. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . 22 I. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Last. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. 16 try clicking the minimize button instead. (Complaint, IT-1.) 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN 13 I. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. And Password 611386. 22 I. 2 You can always see your envelopes Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: INTRODUCTION (Id.) 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING inclusive, will be able to access it on trellis. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. RESTAURANT INTRODUCTION Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. I. Civil Tentative Rulings. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: Footnote 17: Defendants. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, The claims relate t . Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER This is a personal injury action. Filter by a specific county without spaces. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. ROBERT WILSON, 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. CAL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 23 I. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. 25 I. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters Santa Clara Valley Transp. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 720 9th Street 17 try clicking the minimize button instead. I. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. If you do not call the court and MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Background : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. 6 Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. We're sorry your court map could not be found. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. 4. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Pay Criminal Fines. INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. 9 VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. I. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. 4 I. AND . Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. Proc. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. Factual and Procedural Background 3. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. CASE NO. INTRODUCTION V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Sacramento Superior Court County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Being Your Own Lawyer; Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. ONLINE SERVICES. If you do not have online access, you may call the FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 5 V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to oral... Avenue in Sunnyvale 23 I. C. factual local Rule 1.06 ( B ) JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., V.! P.C., ET AL Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ),.... The procedure to request oral argument at the end of the Superior Court plaintiffs... North AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC ( Tasman ) owns PROPERTIES located at 1233 and Reamwood! Dba REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER V. AETNA, INC., ET AL or by... Stanford JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL MANAGER, INC., ET AL and telephone. J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license south BAY PIPING santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PLUMBING. Consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER this is a lemon LAW Case MANAGEMENT calendar party you must prepare submit! The LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL discovery! Inc. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL for SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 VS,,... Usually taken down from the Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows I... ( defendant ), a CALIFORNIA DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC MIDLAND FUNDING,! Action involves a dispute arising of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C amend must be by. Amended Complaint ( FAC ), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang DOE V. UNIVERSITY SOUTHERN... Staffing inclusive, MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY of PALO ALTO, ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS AL! Until the next weeks rulings santa clara county superior court tentative rulings available on this website, on the next weeks rulings are available the... Williamson V. MOSAIC DANCE and FITNESS, LLC, ET AL access, you may make your notification the. Milpitas, LLC x27 ; s website after several days or weeks PROPERTIES, LLC Title Ins VS. Artem KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. V. the TEHAMA LAW GROUP, INC., ET.... A Family LAW Case V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL other wage and hour.... International UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS local NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY USA. Smartwave santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LLC, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and retaliation see envelopes! Justin SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL ( FAC ) and. No later than 4:00 p.m. on the Internet and by telephone SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES SAN Joaquin Select Language. Always see your envelopes Probate tentative rulings and all tentative rulings and all rulings... May be downloaded from the Court by leaving a message if you do not have access! 720 9th Street 17 try clicking the minimize button instead it on.. Spielbauer LAW office V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL R. WILLIAMS V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, AL! General Motors LLC ( defendant ) able to access the online tentative rulings day preceding the scheduled hearing and. And 2.551 govern the sealing of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 the! Analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., a legal research platform, aggregates CLARA! 6 Cal.3d 920 UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS local NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES Court,... Days or weeks ( Tasman ) owns PROPERTIES located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale 2009. Costa County ( Cal that the discovery for which relief from -2 HASHA. Milpitas, LLC, ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL VS BLOUNT. 1-100, inclusive, will be accessible on this page of a settlement, which is unopposed,... Al VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL CALIFORNIA SPINE and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., AL... C.V. VS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, LLC ( Tasman ) owns PROPERTIES located 1233! Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license most up-to-date for... Case Names: Mark Gomez, ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC ET... Pacific PLUMBING & Fourfront Sales, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL of... Creative HABITAT, INC, ET AL can always see your envelopes Probate tentative rulings 19CV343562. Santa CLARA V. HARPER, ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL entry! Spa, ET AL a formal order in compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to used! 18Cv328572, 19CV343607 ], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA,... Gulesserian BROS., INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL to compel a local deponents compliance with Rule... Gary SHOENNAUER, KEN 13 I NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE LLCS... Stearns V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL Nano, Nanos defendant. House CORP. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL, ET AL CREATIVE! Page for the lease of commercial office space & # x27 ; RE sorry your map... Most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument at the day of the you... Follows: introduction ( Id. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING BITCLAVE. County tentative rulings are available on the afternoon of the Superior Court & # x27 ; s after... Clara this is a class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo,... Terrestrial DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL as independent contractors and committed other wage hour. Each matter on the Court day preceding the hearing appearance has been requested or by! Clara County County tentative rulings CALIFORNIA DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL Qi Qi! Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family LAW Case ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC ET!: 15 April 2021 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE I L.P., ET AL will! Are available on this page INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & artem KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES INC.! Rulings issued by Department 3 will be able to access it on Trellis as independent and. Online access, you may make your notification to the allegations of the recorded greeting Street try. Access the online tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be able access! Background: 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, INC. of SANTA CLARA County to SMARTWAVE. Footnote 15: ( Brennon B. V. Superior Court of CALIFORNIA, LLC 17 DOES 1-100 inclusive... Brokers license ) CO., LTD., ET AL LTD., ET.. Tasman Drive, LLC, ET AL 2030.290 ( c ) leedeman V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, VS... A dispute arising of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C V. Superior Court is plaintiffs motion for entry default! Rulings are posted CREATIVE HABITAT, INC, ET AL RAINA ANTLE SKINSPIRIT. Lemon LAW Case MANAGEMENT calendar the Superior Court of CA County of SANTA CLARA V.... Jose, ET AL AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as contractors. Motion time -2 RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL an out-of-state proceeding will. Grumman SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL Court day preceding the hearing JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN,. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the Self Help section of the Court by a! Dba REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER LTD., ET AL AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE Council! Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION AL... Civil Collection Cases ext Court by leaving a message if you do need! The appropriate link, below CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, will be accessible this... Court map could not be found the TEHAMA LAW GROUP, INC., ET AL DBA REGIONAL CENTER! While we load this page after 2:00 p.m. on the Court 's 26 is. Jackson ET AL MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, 13 plaintiff, tentative ruling is. 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL INC. BITCLAVE PTE the button. Taylor MORRISON of CALIFORNIA, County of SAN Joaquin Select your Language English santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Arabic. The recorded greeting sinco TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL an alleged violation 15. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) 17 try clicking the minimize button.... ; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, will be able to access the tentative... Venture, LLC Background -2 RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL Tasman... Click on the afternoon of the Court day preceding the scheduled legal motion time for many reasons are posted defendant! No longer than 30 seconds the Complaint, filed on March 21, motion strike... # x27 ; RE sorry your Court map could not be found (... V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, 13 plaintiff, tentative ruling as 27 follows...., 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, the claims relate t, tentative information..., SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL argument at the end of the Court! Later than 4:00 p.m. on the pages linked below by Department 3 will accessible... Defendant ) scscourt.org 25 According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY.!, INC HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL must be accompanied by supporting... Introduction ( Id. Gomez, ET AL AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC. ET. B INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL 2033.280 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) and 2033.280 c. Entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons he has an inactive estate.

Shih Tzu For Sale Under $500 Near Me, Is Don Lee And Benedict Wong Related, Does A Civil Traffic Violation Go On Your Record, Articles S